Bias for action is a mindset that prioritizes taking action over planning and analysis. In product development, a bias for action can be beneficial because it helps teams move quickly, make decisions, and get feedback on their ideas. However, it can also be detrimental if it leads to poor decision-making and a lack of thorough planning and testing.
One of the benefits of a bias for action is that it can help teams move quickly and get products to market faster. By focusing on taking action, teams can iterate and improve their products more quickly. This can be especially important in fast-moving industries where being first to market can be a significant advantage or there is extreme emphasis on 'fail fast'/ 'learn quickly' concepts. However, a bias for action can also lead to poor decision-making and a lack of thorough planning and testing. When teams prioritize action over planning and analysis, they may make decisions based on incomplete information or assumptions. This can lead to products that don't meet customer needs or that are not viable in the long term. Additionally, a bias for action can also lead to a lack of thorough testing and validation. When teams prioritize action over testing, they may release products that have not been thoroughly tested and validated, which can lead to customer dissatisfaction and product failure. ANALOGY: Think of Bias for Action as a strong desire to drive a car in great speed. However, if you are a new driver or you are still trying to figure out the road, the car or even where you want to go and how will you get there, how do you see driving in speed working out? The same thing happens when a product gets developed with speed without a bunch of things in place, its development speed may be directly proportional to the crash and burn path it maybe on. EXAMPLES: An example of how bias for action proved to be good for a product is the development of the original iPhone. When the iPhone was first developed, the team at Apple had a strong bias for action. They focused on getting the product to market quickly, which allowed them to be first to market with a revolutionary new product. The iPhone was a huge success, and its launch helped establish Apple as a dominant player in the smartphone market. On the other hand, an example of how bias for action proved to be bad for a product is the development of the Google Glass. The Google Glass team had a strong bias for action, and they focused on getting the product to market quickly without adequately testing and gathering feedback from potential users. As a result, the product had several issues such as privacy concerns, social acceptability and functionality which caused it to be not well received by the market and ultimately led to discontinuation of the product. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, a bias for action can be beneficial in product development as it helps teams move quickly and make decisions, but it can also be detrimental if it leads to poor decision-making and a lack of thorough planning and testing. It is important to strike a balance between action and planning and testing to ensure that products are developed in a way that meets customer needs and is viable in the long term. Comments are closed.
|
Archives
February 2023
Categories |